The Two Babylons
Alexander Hislop
Chapter 5
Rites
and Ceremonies
Section I
Idol Processions
Those who have read the
account of the last idol procession in the capital of Scotland, in John Knox's
History of the Reformation, cannot easily have forgot the tragi-comedy
with which it ended. The light of the Gospel had widely spread, the Popish
idols had lost their fascination, and popular antipathy was everywhere rising
against them. "The images," says the historian, "were stolen away in all parts
of the country; and in Edinburgh was that great idol called Sanct Geyle [the
patron saint of the capital], first drowned in the North Loch, after burnt,
which raised no small trouble in the town." The bishops demanded of the Town
Council either "to get them again the old Sanct Geyle, or else, upon their
(own) expenses, to make a new image." The Town Council could not do the
one, and the other they absolutely refused to do; for they were now
convinced of the sin of idolatry. The bishops and priests, however, were still
made upon their idols; and, as the anniversary of the feast of St. Giles was
approaching, when the saint used to be carried in procession through the town,
they determined to do their best, that the accustomed procession should take
place with as much pomp as possible. For this purpose, "a marmouset idole" was
borrowed from the Grey friars, which the people, in derision, called "Young
Sanct Geyle," and which was made to do service instead of the old one. On the
appointed day, says Know, "there assembled priests, friars, canons...with
taborns and trumpets, banners, and bagpipes; and who was there to lead the ring
but the Queen Regent herself, with all her shavelings, for honour of that
feast. West about goes it, and comes down the High Street, and down to the
Canno Cross." As long as the Queen was present, all went to the heart's content
of the priests and their partisans. But no sooner had majesty retired to dine,
than some in the crowd, who had viewed the whole concern with an evil eye,
"drew nigh to the idol, as willing to help to bear him, and getting the fertour
(or barrow) on their shoulders, began to shudder, thinking that thereby the
idol should have fallen. But that was provided and prevented by the iron nails
[with which it was fastened to the fertour]; and so began one to cry, 'Down
with the idol, down with it'; and so without delay it was pulled down. Some
brag made the priests' patrons at the first; but when they saw the feebleness
of their god, for one took him by the heels, and dadding [knocking] his head to
the calsay [pavement], left Dagon without head or hands, and said, 'Fye upon
thee, thou young Sanct Geyle, thy father would have tarried [withstood] four
such [blows]'; this considered, we say, the priests and friars fled faster than
they did at Pinkey Cleuch. There might have been seen so sudden a fray as
seldom has been seen amongst that sort of men within this realm; for down goes
the crosses, off goes the surplice, round caps corner with the crowns. The Grey
friars gaped, the Black friars blew, the priests panted and fled, and happy was
he that first gat the house; for such ane sudden fray came never amongst the
generation of Antichrist within this realm before."
Such an idol procession among
a people who had begun to study and relish the Word of God, elicited nothing
but indignation and scorn. But in Popish lands, among a people studiously kept
in the dark, such processions are among the favourite means which the Romish
Church employs to bind its votaries to itself. The long processions with images
borne on men's shoulders, with the gorgeous dresses of the priests, and the
various habits of different orders of monks and nuns, with the aids of flying
banners and the thrilling strains of instrumental music, if not too closely
scanned, are well fitted "plausibly to amuse" the worldly mind, to gratify the
love for the picturesque, and when the emotions thereby called forth are
dignified with the names of piety and religion, to minister to the purposes of
spiritual despotism. Accordingly, Popery has ever largely availed itself of
such pageants. On joyous occasions, it has sought to consecrate the hilarity
and excitement created by such processions to the service of its idols; and in
seasons of sorrow, it has made use of the same means to draw forth the deeper
wail of distress from the multitudes that throng the procession, as if the mere
loudness of the cry would avert the displeasure of a justly offended God.
Gregory, commonly called the
Great, seems to have been the first who, on a large scale, introduced
those religious processions into the Roman Church. In 590, when Rome was
suffering under the heavy hand of God from the pestilence, he exhorted the
people to unite publicly in supplication to God, appointing that they should
meet at daybreak in SEVEN DIFFERENT COMPANIES, according to their respective
ages, SEXES, and stations, and walk in seven different processions, reciting
litanies or supplications, till they all met at one place. They did so, and
proceeded singing and uttering the words, "Lord, have mercy upon us," carrying
along with them, as Baronius relates, by Gregory's express command, an image of
the Virgin. The very idea of such processions was an affront to the majesty of
heaven; it implied that God who is a Spirit "saw with eyes of flesh," and might
be moved by the imposing picturesqueness of such a spectacle, just as sensuous
mortals might. As an experiment it had but slender success. In the space of one
hour, while thus engaged, eighty persons fell to the ground, and breathed their
last. Yet this is now held up to Britons as "the more excellent way" for
deprecating the wrath of God in a season of national distress. "Had this
calamity," says Dr. Wiseman, referring to the Indian disasters, "had this
calamity fallen upon our forefathers in Catholic days, one would have seen the
streets of this city [London] trodden in every direction by penitential
processions, crying out, like David, when pestilence had struck the people." If
this allusion to David has any pertinence or meaning, it must imply that David,
in the time of pestilence, headed some such "penitential procession." But Dr.
Wiseman knows, or ought to know, that David did nothing of the sort, that his
penitence was expressed in no such way as by processions, and far less by idol
processions, as "in the Catholic days of our forefathers," to which we are
invited to turn back. This reference to David, then, is a mere blind, intended
to mislead those who are not given to Bible reading, as if such "penitential
processions" had something of Scripture warrant to rest upon. The Times,
commenting on this recommendation of the Papal dignitary, has hit the nail on
the head. "The historic idea," says that journal, "is simple enough, and as old
as old can be. We have it in Homer--the procession of Hecuba and the ladies of
Troy to the shrine of Minerva, in the Acropolis of that city." It was a time of
terror and dismay in Troy, when Diomede, with resistless might, was driving
everything before him, and the overthrow of the proud city seemed at hand. To
avert the apparently inevitable doom, the Trojan Queen was divinely
directed.
"To
lead the assembled train
Of Troy's chief matron's to Minerva's fane."
And she did so:--
"Herself...the long procession leads;
The
train majestically slow proceeds.
Soon as to Ilion's topmost tower they
come,
And awful reach the high Palladian dome,
Antenor's consort,
fair Theano, waits
As Pallas' priestess, and unbars the gates.
With
hands uplifted and imploring eyes,
They fill the dome with supplicating
cries."
Here is a precedent for
"penitential processions" in connection with idolatry entirely to the point,
such as will be sought for in vain in the history of David, or any of the Old
Testament saints. Religious processions, and especially processions with
images, whether of a jubilant or sorrowful description, are purely Pagan. In
the Word of God we find two instances in which there were processions practised
with Divine sanction; but when the object of these processions is compared with
the avowed object and character of Romish processions, it will be seen that
there is no analogy between them and the processions of Rome. The two cases to
which I refer are the seven days' encompassing of Jericho, and the procession
at the bringing up of the ark of God from Kirjath-jearim to the city of David.
The processions, in the first case, though attended with the symbols of Divine
worship, were not intended as acts of religious worship, but were a miraculous
mode of conducting war, when a signal interposition of Divine power was to be
vouchsafed. In the other, there was simply the removing of the ark, the symbol
of Jehovah's presence, from the place where, for a long period, it had been
allowed to lie in obscurity, to the place which the Lord Himself had chosen for
its abode; and on such an occasion it was entirely fitting and proper that the
transference should be made with all religious solemnity. But these were simply
occasional things, and have nothing at all in common with Romish processions,
which form a regular part of the Papal ceremonial. But, though Scripture speaks
nothing of religious processions in the approved worship of God, it refers once
and again to Pagan processions, and these, too, accompanied with images; and it
vividly exposes the folly of those who can expect any good from gods that
cannot move from one place to another, unless they are carried. Speaking of the
gods of Babylon, thus saith the prophet Isaiah (46:6),
"They lavish gold
out of the bag, and weigh silver in the balance, and hire a goldsmith; and he
maketh it a god: they fall down, yea, they worship. They bear him upon the
shoulder, they carry him, and set him in his place, and he standeth; from
his place he shall not remove."
In the sculptures of Nineveh
these processions of idols, borne on men's shoulders, are forcibly represented,
and form at once a striking illustration of the prophetic language, and of the
real origin of the Popish processions. In Egypt, the same practice was
observed. In "the procession of shrines," says Wilkinson, "it was usual to
carry the statue of the principal deity, in whose honour the procession took
place, together with that of the king, and the figures of his ancestors, borne
in the same manner, on men's shoulders." But not only are the processions in
general identified with the Babylonian system. We have evidence that these
processions trace their origin to that very disastrous event in the history of
Nimrod, which has already occupied so much of our attention. Wilkinson says
"that Diodorus speaks of an Ethiopian festival of Jupiter, when his statue was
carried in procession, probably to commemorate the supposed refuge of the gods
in that country, which," says he, "may have been a memorial of the flight of
the Egyptians with their gods." The passage of Diodorus, to which Wilkinson
refers, is not very decisive as to the object for which the statues of Jupiter
and Juno (for Diodorus mentions the shrine of Juno as well as of Jupiter) were
annually carried into the land of Ethiopia, and then, after a certain period of
sojourn there, were brought back to Egypt again. But, on comparing it with
other passages of antiquity, its object very clearly appears. Eustathius says,
that at the festival in question, "according to some, the Ethiopians
used to fetch the images of Zeus, and other gods from the great temple of Zeus
at Thebes. With these images they went about at a certain period in Libya, and
celebrated a splendid festival for twelve gods." As the festival was called an
Ethiopian festival; and as it was Ethiopians that both carried away the idols
and brought them back again, this indicates that the idols must have been
Ethiopian idols; and as we have seen that Egypt was under the power of Nimrod,
and consequently of the Cushites or Ethiopians, when idolatry was for a time
put down in Egypt, what would this carrying of the idols into Ethiopia, the
land of the Cushites, that was solemnly commemorated every year, be, but just
the natural result of the temporary suppression of the idol-worship inaugurated
by Nimrod.
In Mexico, we have an account
of an exact counterpart of this Ethiopian festival. There, at a certain period,
the images of the gods were carried out of the country in a mourning
procession, as if taking their leave of it, and then, after a time, they were
brought back to it again with every demonstration of joy. In Greece, we find a
festival of an entirely similar kind, which, while it connects itself with the
Ethiopian festival of Egypt on the one hand, brings that festival, on the
other, into the closest relation to the penitential procession of Pope Gregory.
Thus we find Potter referring first to a "Delphian festival in memory of a
JOURNEY of Apollo"; and then under the head of the festival called Apollonia,
we thus read: "To Apollo, at Aegialea on this account: Apollo having obtained a
victory over Python, went to Aegialea, accompanied with his sister Diana; but,
being frightened from thence, fled into Crete. After this, the
Aegialeans were infected with an epidemical distemper; and, being advised by
the prophets to appease the two offended deities, sent SEVEN boys and as many
virgins to entreat them to return. [Here is the typical germ of 'The Sevenfold
Litany' of Pope Gregory.] Apollo and Diana accepted their piety,...and it
became a custom to appoint chosen boys and virgins, to make a solemn
procession, in show, as if they designed to bring back Apollo and Diana, which
continued till Pausanias' time." The contest between Python and Apollo, in
Greece, is just the counterpart of that between Typho and Osiris in Egypt; in
other words, between Shem and Nimrod. Thus we see the real meaning and origin
of the Ethiopian festival, when the Ethiopians carried away the gods from the
Egyptian temples. That festival evidently goes back to the time when Nimrod
being cut off, idolatry durst not show itself except among the devoted
adherents of the "Mighty hunter" (who were found in his own family--the family
of Cush), when, with great weepings and lamentations, the idolaters fled with
their gods on their shoulders, to hide themselves where they might. In
commemoration of the suppression of idolatry, and the unhappy consequences that
were supposed to flow from that suppression, the first part of the festival, as
we get light upon it both from Mexico and Greece, had consisted of a procession
of mourners; and then the mourning was turned into joy, in memory of the happy
return of these banished gods to their former exaltation. Truly a worthy origin
for Pope Gregory's "Sevenfold Litany" and the Popish processions.
[Back |
Home |
Contents |
Next]
Top of Page
|